Case File #2 of HUAC 2.0 stops talking about “the system” like it’s a mystery cloud and starts naming the people who keep breaking it on purpose.
In Case File #1 of the House Un-American Activities Committee 2.0 (HUAC 2.0) series, we laid out the mission:
Follow the policies. Follow the power. Follow the wreckage.
We talked about bad laws, soft-on-crime “reforms,” and the way dangerous ideas keep getting dressed up as compassion.
But at some point you have to stop saying “the system” and start talking about names.
Systems don’t write themselves. Press releases don’t write themselves. Campaign ads don’t record themselves. Real people, with real power, are choosing to push this stuff and then acting shocked at the results.
Case File #2: The Ideologues in the Hot Seat is HUAC 2.0’s first pass at the rogues’ gallery—politicians and public figures who consistently choose ideology and theatrics over order, safety, and common sense.
Not because of what they look like. Because of what they do.
Some of these people pass laws. Some run offices. Some control budgets. Others shape the narrative and give political cover to the rest. All of them help keep the worst policies alive.
This isn’t a legal indictment. It’s a political case file: here’s who they are, what they push, and why HUAC 2.0 would like a few hours with each of them under oath.
The Lawfare & Power Wing
These are the people who turn institutions into partisan weapons, or treat serious offices like stepping stones and TV stages.
Letitia James
New York Attorney General Letitia James practically ran on a platform of “Get Trump,” turning what should be a neutral law-enforcement office into a political battering ram. Instead of convincing New Yorkers she’ll crack down on crime and corruption across the board, she’s made it clear: if you’re the designated enemy of the moment, the state will find a statute to beat you with, while everyday public-safety disasters get less attention.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“How much of your agenda is about protecting New Yorkers—and how much is about scoring points against one man?” And now she is playing her victim card, “we shall not bend, we shall not break” Give us a break and just admit you are a crooked AG and weaponized your office against Trump just because you hate him. Americans love a confessed loser!
Kamala Harris
Before she was Vice President, Kamala Harris was a “tough on crime” prosecutor—until the winds shifted. Then she rebranded overnight as a criminal-justice reform champion, promoted bail funds for 2020 rioters, and was put “in charge” of the border while doing everything possible to avoid owning it. She talked about “root causes” as illegal crossings spiked and border communities buckled.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“At any point, did securing the border matter to you more than keeping your progressive credentials intact?” Answer: “I wouldn’t change a thing!” And just what kind of “dressing” are we supposed to imagine would make a “word salad” more palatable? Maybe something like Blanch or Thousand Lies, or better yet, Snake Oil & Vinegar?
Pete Buttigieg
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg faces a gigantic mission: supply chains, air travel, rail safety, ports. Instead, he’s spent much of his tenure looking more like a talk-show regular than the guy responsible for keeping the country moving. While Americans dealt with grounded flights, derailments, and bottlenecks, they got equity slogans and vague statements, not visible leadership.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Do you see your job primarily as managing infrastructure—or as managing optics?” Does your queer self focus more about equity slogans, LBGTQ rights, than on helping Americans deal with grounded flights, derailments, and bottlenecks? Joe Everyman wants to know.
Julián Castro
Former HUD Secretary and 2020 presidential hopeful Julián Castro leaned into open-borders rhetoric and public shaming of Trump donors. He embraced the idea of publicizing private citizens’ political donations to paint targets on their backs, normalizing the concept that disagreement should come packaged with harassment and social punishment.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Do you believe Americans should fear public exposure and retaliation simply for donating to the ‘wrong’ candidate?”
Beto O’Rourke
Beto O’Rourke has run for just about everything, and lost just about everything, but the cameras keep coming back. His greatest hits include “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15” and grandstanding at press events after tragedies like Uvalde. He’s turned gun control into pure performance, treating millions of law-abiding gun owners as the enemy while criminals ignore every new law he sells.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Is public safety your top priority—or is demonizing gun owners simply your pathway to power?”
The Street-Agitator & Soundbite Wing
These are the people who rely on outrage clips, identity politics, and protest theater to stay relevant.
Jasmine Crockett
Rep. Jasmine Crockett is better known for viral committee brawls and screaming matches than for any legislative achievement. Every disagreement becomes a race or extremism accusation; every hearing turns into an audition tape. The question isn’t, “How do we solve this problem?” It’s, “How do I get this clip trending?”
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Have you ever walked away from a microphone because fixing the issue mattered more than getting the quote?” And BTW, your spending on luxury accommodations is out of control. And further, Joe Everyman along with Bill O’Reilly wants know “where is the House Ethics Committee when Crock calls our President a POS?” Perfect example here: if HEC won’t sensor her (heaven forbid they get called racists) our proposed HUAC will, “shut your fat, ugly, African un-American mouth about our president, you miserable, headline grabbing skank!”
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the patron saint of Instagram socialism and fantasy math. The Green New Deal, “defund”-adjacent policing rhetoric, guaranteed this and free that—all backed by economics that collapse outside a college campus. She’s an undeniable media creation: big audience, big platform, thin results.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“How many of your proposals can survive contact with a spreadsheet—and how many are just designed to keep you trending?” and just how far will your semi-pretty face and big boobs get you when it comes right down to actually doing something? AOC in ’28? What a joke!
Maxine Waters
Rep. Maxine Waters once told her supporters to confront Trump officials in public, then turned around and cast herself as a defender of decorum and democracy. She’s reliably available to blame Republicans and “systemic racism” for every crisis while the communities she represents remain trapped in the same violent, low-opportunity loop year after year.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Do your constituents have more safety and opportunity now than when you took office—or just more headlines?” Does your perpetual frown on that scowling, mummified face help you get your African un-American points across or is your 85 year old rhetoric finally out of gas?
The Party-Leader & Movement Wing
These are the people who give the ideological project a spine, or at least a megaphone.
Hakeem Jeffries
House Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries is the smooth, TV-friendly face of the same agenda: Republicans as “threats to democracy,” border and crime concerns as overblown, soft-on-crime policies as “reform.” He flirted with 2016 election denial when it suited him, then pretended questioning elections began in 2020.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Why is it ‘protecting democracy’ when your party questions elections, but ‘insurrection talk’ when the other side does it?”
Bernie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders is the grandfather of American socialism, forever promising Scandinavian results with Venezuela-adjacent methods. He wants government at the center of your paycheck, your healthcare, your energy, your education. The track record of regimes he once made excuses for doesn’t bother him; he insists that this time, with him in charge, it will all work out.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Why should Americans trust a model that has failed everywhere it’s been tried at scale?”
Ilhan Omar
Rep. Ilhan Omar built a national profile criticizing America and Israel while minimizing threats from our enemies. From “some people did something” about 9/11 to “It’s all about the Benjamins” about pro-Israel advocacy, she’s repeatedly walked the edge of rhetoric that would end other political careers—but identity politics keeps providing cover.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Do you understand that the country you constantly condemn is the same one that gave you the freedom and platform you now use against it?” Why would anyone listen to the opinion of a second string catcher for the Somali Pirates who married her own brother to come to the US?
Stacey Abrams
Stacey Abrams turned the 2018 Georgia governor’s race into an endless campaign by insisting she was the “real” winner. She mainstreamed election denial long before Democrats pretended that was a uniquely Republican sin, and built a national fundraising machine around claims of voter suppression—even as turnout statistics undercut the story.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“When, exactly, did you decide that conceding elections was optional?”
Cory Booker
Sen. Cory Booker is the high-drama senator of “Spartacus” fame, famous for theatrical outrage during the Kavanaugh hearings and emotionally charged soundbites on justice and compassion. Behind the scenes, he’s backed the same soft-on-crime and big-government policies that helped his own state’s cities slide into deeper trouble.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“How many of your most emotional speeches line up with real improvements in safety and prosperity back home?”
Jay Inslee
Washington Governor Jay Inslee uses climate policy as a Swiss army knife for expanding government power and squeezing energy choices, especially in rural areas. During the CHAZ/CHOP fiasco in Seattle, he initially acted clueless, then minimized an anarchic occupation that left residents and business owners to fend for themselves.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“At what point did protecting public order take a backseat to avoiding conflict with your own protest wing?”
The Media-Politics Hybrids
These aren’t elected officials, but they shape Democratic talking points and give cover to the rest of the roster.
Joy Reid
MSNBC’s Joy Reid turns almost every story into a sermon on race, with conservatives playing the villain. Old blog posts that would have ended a right-of-center host’s career somehow didn’t sink her, but she’s eager to demand professional exile for her political opponents. Her show teaches viewers that half the country is bigoted, dangerous, or both.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Do you see any path back to national unity other than your enemies confessing they’re every name you’ve called them?”
Sunny Hostin
On The View, Sunny Hostin acts as the panel’s in-house prosecutor. Democrats are default virtuous; Republicans are a stew of racism, fascism, and religious extremism. It’s not analysis; it’s catechism for viewers who want moral certainty that they’re the good guys and the other half of the country is beyond saving.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“Is there a single conservative position you think is held in good faith—or are tens of millions of Americans just villains in your script?”
Whoopi Goldberg
Whoopi Goldberg mixes moral lecturing with historical faceplants, like calling the Holocaust “white-on-white violence.” She mocks traditional values and religious conservatives while granting endless indulgences to left-wing causes, no matter how chaotic the fallout. The message is simple: our side means well, your side is dangerous.
HUAC 2.0 question:
“If you get basic history wrong on air, why should anyone trust you to judge who’s on the right side of it today?”
Why HUAC 2.0 Cares
Again: this isn’t about race, gender, or any other label. It’s about behavior.
If you weaponize your office to go after political enemies, that’s an un-American activity.
If you promote policies that make your voters less safe while you live behind security, that’s an un-American activity.
If you build your whole career on stoking division and demonizing half the country, that’s an un-American activity.
Case File #2 is just the opening salvo on the ideologue class—a first draft of the subpoena list.
HUAC 2.0 doesn’t want them canceled. It wants them questioned. Under oath. In public. Until voters see exactly who’s been steering the ship and what they’ve really been selling.
Bunker Notice
If you made it this far, you’re bunker material. Join the Bunker Briefing—my unfiltered monthly dispatch from Bunker #69.
