A Marine’s take on the “No Kings” spectacle — why buzzwords aren’t bravery.
I watched the “No Kings” spectacle and the coverage wrapped in therapy-speak—buzzwords like “boundaries,” “holding space,” and “that’s triggering.” In the Marines we had a simpler phrase: suck it up. Not because feelings don’t matter, but because mission and truth do.
What “therapy-speak” is — and why it spreads
Therapy-speak is the habit of borrowing clinical terms for everyday debates. It can reduce stigma around mental health, sure. But it also gets abused to:
- shut down conversations (“I’m setting a boundary” = no questions allowed),
- dodge accountability (“I feel unsafe” = your disagreement is harm),
- and misapply complex concepts to simple, public claims that ought to be defended.
Result? Impersonal exchanges, muddled arguments, and more heat than light.
Costume politics & clout-chasing
Some folks aren’t chasing “historic meaning” — they’re chasing a party with people who’ll validate their grievances on loop. It’s look-at-me street theater: inflatable dino suits, zero facts, and the same recycled chants. If you can’t explain why someone is “horrible” with one concrete example, you’re just noise in a costume. Some even compare “No Kings” to the Civil Rights Movement. That’s cosplay history: attention ≠ courage, spectacle ≠ sacrifice.
As Speaker Mike Johnson characterized it: a “Hate America Rally.”
If your message needs a T-rex suit to be heard, maybe the message isn’t there.
The plain-English standard (Marine rules for debate)
- Say it straight. No jargon shields.
- Bring one fact. If you can’t name one policy, one quote, one datum—you’ve got vibes, not an argument.
- Argue the point, not the person. Insults are cheap; specifics are hard. Do the hard thing.
- Earn courage offline. Volunteer. Help a neighbor. Do a night shift where it counts.
- Boundaries are for safety, not silence. They’re not a “mute” button on other citizens.
Quick decoder: therapy-speak → plain English
| Therapy-speak | Plain English | Valid use | Dodge alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| “That’s triggering.” | “That pisses me off.” | Trauma context, personal boundaries. | Used to end debate on public claims. |
| “I’m setting a boundary.” | “i dare you to cross this line.” | Protecting time/health. | Used to avoid all scrutiny. |
| “Hold space for me.” | “shut up and Listen without interrupting.” | During support conversations. | Demanding silence in public square. |
| “Center my lived experience.” | “Consider my side.” | Adds context to facts. | Replaces facts with feelings. |
| “Emotional labor.” | “This is giving me a headache.” | Real in care work. | Labeling any disagreement as exploitation. |
A simple test for protest talk
If you say “Charlie Kirk is horrible,” you should be able to answer:
Name one position, quote, or action you oppose—and why.
If you can’t, you’re chanting, not persuading.
Bottom line
Help us stop the wussification of America. We need spines and specifics, not therapy-filters and mascot suits. Stop using depression as an excuse to face reality, you got yourself into this mess, forget the xanax or the weed, and work your problems out. If your case is strong, it survives plain English and a few hard questions. If it isn’t, “holding space” won’t save it.
Bunker #69 — Subscribe
Get new posts, field notes, and mission updates straight from the bunker.