Let’s not kid ourselves. After the debate disaster, it’s painfully obvious Joe Biden hasn’t been calling the shots — unless by “shots” you mean the flu kind from the White House nurse’s station.
So who’s been running the country for the last few years?
Jill Biden?
She’s been by his side every step of the way — or rather, a step ahead, guiding him off stages and through interviews. On Election Day, she rocked a bold red pantsuit, and while the media ignored it, was it a subtle middle finger to the Democratic machine that threw her husband under the bus? Political wardrobe… or power move?
Jill and her dummy
Hunter Biden?
Maybe the guy with the most “artistic” legal career in America has been filling the power vacuum. From shady laptops to courtroom dramas, Hunter’s been everywhere but nowhere — and yet somehow still close enough to influence (or “advise”) whatever needed handling. And is there any question whose cocaine was discovered in the White House? Almost as shameful as blow jobs in the Oval Office.
Or… the Autopen?
When in doubt, trust the machine. Is it some faceless staffer with a steady hand and access to the autopen that’s really been running the Oval Office? At this point, we wouldn’t be shocked if executive orders were being faxed in from Wilmington.
Now Oversight says the quiet part out loud
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform just dropped what they are calling “the biggest political scandal in American presidential history” — a report arguing that Biden’s cognitive decline was obvious inside the West Wing, and that major decisions were being pushed through without a clear chain of command.
According to the Committee’s summary, transcribed interviews and depositions with former senior staff paint a picture of a White House that:
Shielded Biden from unscripted events and key policy meetings that could expose his condition.
Saw political operatives allegedly interfere in medical decisions, including discouraging cognitive testing for political optics.
Used an autopen to sign executive actions and other official documents — with staffers allegedly admitting they didn’t know who authorized certain signatures.
Hit the Committee with stonewalling: witnesses who refused to testify, and others who invoked the Fifth Amendment rather than answer questions under oath.
If your own senior aides can’t say who approved signatures in the President’s name… that’s not “smooth operations.” That’s a constitutional fog machine.
To be clear: these are the Committee’s claims and conclusions — and you can bet the media will either bury it, mock it, or “fact-check” it into oblivion. But the core question still stands, and it’s not going away:
Who, exactly, was making decisions — and who was authorizing the autopen?
Two scandals for the price of one. One president. Zero leadership.
And they told us he was “sharp.” Sharp as what — a bag of wet cotton?
Meanwhile, the news cycle has already sprinted to the next fire — including the Minnesota “Feed Our Future” fraud case, which has generated a flood of headlines and big-dollar claims. That’s how it works now: one scandal gets smothered by the next before anybody answers the basic questions, counting on the short memories of American voters who tire of scandals easily. Shrugging their shoulders at each other and saying “well, business as usual in the swamp“.
The autopen story may resurface hard later — especially if more sworn testimony drops — and when it does, we’ll keep you updated.
Chatrodamus Predicts:
Biden is out of office and is a forgotten, lonely old man. The autopen scandal will be swept under the rug. Everyone knows by now Biden was just a puppet but no one cares any more. Let sleeping dogs lie.
Bunker Notice
If you made it this far, you’re bunker material. Join the Bunker Briefing—my unfiltered monthly dispatch from Bunker #69.
